Code Quality & Architecture Review
We audit codebase health, scalability, and hidden costs that impact future growth.

Fast, independent technology assessments that tell you exactly what affects the deal and what to do next.
Our Due Diligence Process
We look beyond the codebase. Our global audits evaluate the complete engineering ecosystem in just two to three weeks, uncovering hidden liabilities before you close the deal.
Are the right leaders in place? We assess key-person risk, team structure, and CTO capability to ensure they can execute your post-deal roadmap.
How do they build and protect? We audit deployment velocity, QA workflows, and strict regulatory compliance (GDPR, DORA, NIS2) to verify operational maturity.
Can the technology scale? We deep-dive into the architecture, IP exposure, and technical debt, delivering exact remediation costs in Euros and time.
What We Assess
We audit codebase health, scalability, and hidden costs that impact future growth.
We map vulnerabilities and GDPR/DORA/NIS2 gaps against your deal's regulatory requirements.
We test if cloud, DevOps, and CI/CD can handle 5x growth, with costs in euros.
We quantify tech debt in engineering days and euros, with a phased post-close fix plan.
We flag key-person risks, seniority gaps, and culture blockers to your integration plans.
We surface licensing risks, vendor lock-in, and legacy tech that threaten your exit thesis.
Buy-Side vs. Sell-Side
The same methodology, two very different briefs. Use the column that matches your position in the deal.
Spot problems before you buy so you pay the right price and plan the handover.
You get
Used by
Find and fix tech issues first so buyers don't use them to lower your price.
You get
Used by
Why It Matters Now
Three data points every deal partner should have on the desk.
Tech M&A jumped 40% in 2025. Shorter timelines mean costly mistakes on bad assumptions.
Only 50% of banks hit DORA readiness for 2026. Compliance gaps now shift deal prices.
Just one in three insurers was DORA-ready entering 2026. Compliance now drives insurance deals.
Why Dutch Technology Frontiers
The architect who scopes your deal assesses it, writes the findings, and presents them. No handoffs, no context lost.
Based in Netherlands. We deliver across EU, UK, and US. EU data stays local. On-site when needed.
Standard diligence in two to three weeks. Critical deals get preliminary findings within five business days.
If you close, we stay. Fractional CTO, engineering, or fixes. One team, no new vendor to onboard.
A 24-point checklist used by Dutch Technology Frontiers senior architects on live deals. Code, architecture, security, compliance, team, and stack, structured the way an investment committee reads a report.
Download the ChecklistFAQ
Technology due diligence is an independent assessment of a target company's technology, conducted by senior engineers on behalf of an investor, acquirer, or lender. It surfaces the risks, costs, and gaps inside code, architecture, security, and engineering teams before a transaction closes. It is commissioned in four scenarios: Pre-acquisition - a strategic buyer or PE firm needs confidence the platform can be operated, scaled, and integrated Pre-investment - a VC fund is backing a company whose product is its entire value Pre-IPO - a company needs its Technology house in order before public scrutiny Sell-side - a founder wants to identify and fix issues before a buyer finds them Technology due diligence answers whether the technology behind the business model is safe, scalable, compliant, and ownable. Commercial due diligence answers whether the business model works. Both are needed on every technology-backed deal. A standard Dutch Technology Frontiers report covers six areas and is delivered in two to three weeks, with a risk matrix, remediation roadmap, cost-to-fix estimate, and investment recommendation.
A standard Dutch Technology Frontiers Technology due diligence assessment takes two to three weeks from scoping to final report. For time-sensitive deals, a preliminary assessment flags deal-critical risks in five business days. Full diligence follows once exclusivity is agreed.
A Dutch Technology Frontiers report includes an executive summary, risk matrix scored by business impact, detailed findings across code, architecture, security, compliance, team, and stack, a quantified remediation roadmap in euros and engineering days, and an investment recommendation. Every finding is referenced and defensible in an investment committee.
Standard mid-market engagements typically cost between EUR15,000 and EUR50,000. Five-day preliminary assessments are priced lower. Multi-platform or complex targets are quoted on a per-engagement basis. A fixed price is provided before any work begins.
Most deals commission Technology due diligence after an indicative offer is accepted and exclusivity begins. For high-value or technology-dependent acquisitions, a five-day preliminary assessment earlier in the process prevents entering exclusivity on a target that will not pass scrutiny.
Commercial due diligence answers whether the business model works. Technology due diligence answers whether the technology underpinning that business model is safe, scalable, compliant, and ownable. Both are required on any technology-backed deal.
Yes. Our architects cover all major enterprise stacks: Java, Python, .NET, Node.js, Go, modern JavaScript frameworks, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, and the mainstream AI and ML stack. For specialist or mainframe platforms, we bring a named sector specialist into the engagement.
Yes, always. A mutual NDA is in place before any Technology data, code, or documentation is shared. For sensitive deals, we also operate under clean-room conditions with named individuals and access logs.
Buy-side Technology due diligence is commissioned by an investor or acquirer to surface risks before closing. Sell-side is commissioned by the target to identify and remediate issues before a buyer finds them. The methodology is identical; the framing and output emphasis differ.
Yes. We frequently continue as fractional CTO, remediation delivery team, or full engineering partner post-close. Because the same senior team conducted the diligence, there is no context handover and no rediscovery phase.
Yes. For financial services, fintech, and insurance targets, DORA and NIS2 readiness are assessed against the current regulatory text. You receive a compliance posture, a gap list, and a remediation cost estimate inside the main report.